Featured
This Day in History Instagram Reels
We're On Instagram
One of the most difficult battles of the American Revolution was not fought against British troops—but against fragmentation within the American states.
The Continental Congress, operating first under wartime necessity and later under the Articles of Confederation (ratified in 1781), lacked the authority to levy taxes or compel state compliance. It could request troops, clothing, and supplies—but enforcement depended entirely on state cooperation. Each state prioritized its own defense, finances, and militia needs.
The consequences were immediate. During the winter at Valley Forge (1777–1778), supply shortages were not caused by total scarcity alone, but by breakdowns in transportation, contracting, and interstate coordination. Congress relied on requisitions, and states frequently fell short of assigned quotas. Soldiers often went unpaid for months. Uniforms and shoes were scarce. Washington repeatedly wrote to Congress warning that without reliable state support, the army could not endure.
Financial instability compounded the problem. Continental currency depreciated rapidly by 1779–1780, contributing to unrest among the ranks. In January 1781, the Pennsylvania Line Mutiny erupted over pay and enlistment terms, revealing how fragile civil–military trust had become.
Institutional reform followed necessity. In 1781, Robert Morris was appointed Superintendent of Finance and began restructuring national credit and procurement systems. Administrative reforms strengthened the War Department and improved centralized oversight—early steps toward more coordinated national governance.
The Revolution exposed a central dilemma: how could a confederation wage unified war without unified authority? The answer evolved slowly through hardship. The lessons of requisitions, shortages, and mutinies would later shape debates at the Constitutional Convention in 1787.
Independence required endurance. Endurance required coordination. And coordination required learning how to govern together.
👉 Learn more about your patriot legacy here:
https://sar.org
…
17
1
The American Revolution was not fought by soldiers alone.
While armies marched and Congress debated, thousands of women across the colonies carried out the labor that made resistance possible. During the non-importation movements of the 1760s and 1770s, women organized “spinning bees,” producing homespun cloth when British goods were boycotted. Wearing domestic fabric became both economic necessity and political statement.
As war intensified, women managed farms, shops, and plantations while men served in militia units or the Continental Army. British naval blockades disrupted trade, and severe inflation in the late 1770s—driven in part by over-issued Continental currency—strained household economies. Women adapted by preserving food, bartering goods, and sustaining local production networks that kept communities functioning.
Many also served with the army itself. Camp followers—often wives or relatives of soldiers—worked as laundresses, cooks, nurses, and seamstresses. Figures such as Martha Washington spent winters in camp, helping maintain morale. The Ladies Association of Philadelphia, led by Esther DeBerdt Reed in 1780, raised funds to supply Continental soldiers with shirts and material aid. Some women, including Deborah Sampson of Massachusetts, even disguised themselves to serve in combat roles.
Women also participated in political discourse. In 1776, Abigail Adams urged her husband to “remember the ladies” when forming new laws, linking sacrifice to representation. Though independence did not immediately transform women’s legal status, wartime necessity expanded expectations of female education and civic responsibility—an idea later described as “Republican Motherhood.”
The Revolution reshaped public life, but much of its endurance depended on labor performed in homes, fields, workshops, and military camps. The struggle for independence was sustained not only by strategy and arms, but by resilience, skill, and organized domestic effort.
…
18
1
Alexander Hamilton wrote these words in Federalist No. 78 (1788) during the debate over ratification of the United States Constitution. The essay defended the role of the judiciary, but its argument reflected a broader concern: liberty could not survive without stable constitutional structure.
Hamilton’s views were shaped by experience. As a young artillery officer and later as General George Washington’s aide-de-camp from 1777 to 1781, he witnessed firsthand the weaknesses of the Continental Congress under the Articles of Confederation. Congress could request funds from the states but could not compel payment. War debts mounted. Soldiers went unpaid. Interstate trade disputes deepened sectional rivalry. Events like Shays’ Rebellion in 1786 underscored how fragile the post-war union had become.
For Hamilton, the lesson was clear: independence alone was not enough. A republic required enforceable law, national credit, and institutions strong enough to withstand faction. Constitutional government, in his view, did not threaten liberty—it protected it. Structure preserved freedom from both external danger and internal disorder.
The Constitution of 1787 sought to correct the weaknesses Hamilton had observed during the Revolution. Ratification required persuasion, compromise, and trust in process. Hamilton believed that respect for constitutional law—not temporary political advantage—was the sustaining force of a free people.
The Revolution secured independence; the Constitution aimed to preserve it. Enduring liberty depends not on unanimity, but on commitment to lawful order even in times of disagreement.
Learn more about your patriot legacy here:
👉 https://sar.org
These posts are designed as accessible entry points into Revolutionary-era history for broad audiences; while we strive for accuracy, they are not intended as exhaustive academic treatments—thank you for supporting public history and respectful dialogue.
…
36
1
News

November 2025 California Compatriot
You can read the latest issue of the November 2025 California Compatriot here. It should have also been delivered directly to your email inbox. Several other recent issues of the
December 11, 2025

October 2025 California Compatriot
You can read the latest issue of the October 2025 California Compatriot here. It should have also been delivered directly to your email inbox. Several other recent issues of the
October 30, 2025

September 2025 California Compatriot
You can read the latest issue of the September 2025 California Compatriot here. It should have also been delivered directly to your email inbox. Several other recent issues of the
October 1, 2025
